Final Assessment Guidelines – Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 Module title: Competing Philosophies of Education Assessment Point: Portfolio Assessment task: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 Word count limit: 4,500 words Written Assessment Guidelines Part 1: Demonstrate critical understanding of the key debates and traditions discussed in the material of the course within the philosophy of education. Part 2: Evaluate the relative usefulness of a variety of philosophical perspectives on a range of contemporary educational issues. Part 3: Outline your own critical response to issues in education, globalisation and social justice, from a philosophical perspective. Structure of Portfolio Your work should include and cover the following sections/aspects and content (as shown and stated in the table below). The specific percentage marks allocated to each section/aspect of your work is stated below. Please also note that the Level 7 marking criteria (located towards the end of this assessment brief) will also be used to reflect this overall grade. Please remember that achievement and demonstration of both learning outcomes (1 and 2) is being assessed in this assessment. Please find the following tables that show how the 100 points are distributed to the given summative assessment criteria per assignment. Summative Assessment Criteria for Part 1 Marks available Criteria Explanation of Criteria 100/100 Introduction and rationale Introduce what the assignment’s focus will be Give some background here on your first thoughts. Provide the context and the rationale of your literature review and possible debates around this research area. 10 Research aims Explain the aims and objectives of the study. 10 Methodology Explain your search strategy (How did you go about this? Books? Journals? Databases etc.?) – Perhaps use a table here and show, which databases (Emerald/Sage etc.) you used and which journals come from where. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria of literature for the review (ensure the validity and reliability of the research studies you included in your review) 20 Findings of the literature review What does the literature tell you in relation to the three thematic approaches you need to develop? Did anything startling come out of the review that you were not expecting? 25 Conclusions and Implications Try to summarise your literature review and discuss your implications and recommendations. This section should not include any new material. 20 Presentation Cover Page, Table of Contents, Page numbering, Line spacing, Appendices (if it is necessary), Font consistency, Separation of paragraphs. 10 Harvard reference guide Citations and reference list according to the Harvard referencing guide. 5 Summative Assessment Criteria for Part 2 Marks available Criteria Explanation of Criteria 100/100 Introduction and rationale Introduce what the assignment’s focus will be Give some background here on your first thoughts. Provide the context and the rationale of your literature review and possible debates around this research area. 10 Research aims Explain the aims and objectives of the study. 10 Methodology Explain your search strategy (How did you go about this? Books? Journals? Databases etc.?) – Perhaps use a table here and show, which databases (Emerald/Sage etc.) you used and which journals come from where. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria of literature for the review (ensure the validity and reliability of the research studies you included in your review) 20 Findings of the literature review What does the literature tell you in relation to the three thematic approaches you need to develop? Did anything startling come out of the review that you were not expecting? 25 Conclusions and Implications Try to summarise your literature review and discuss your implications and recommendations. This section should not include any new material. 20 Presentation Cover Page, Table of Contents, Page numbering, Line spacing, Appendices (if it is necessary), Font consistency, Separation of paragraphs. 10 Harvard reference guide Citations and reference list according to the Harvard referencing guide. 5 Summative Assessment Criteria for Part 3 Marks available Criteria Explanation of Criteria 100/100 Introduction and rationale Introduce what the assignment’s focus will be Give some background here on your first thoughts. Provide the context and the rationale of your literature review and possible debates around this research area. 10 Research aims Explain the aims and objectives of the study. 10 Methodology Explain your search strategy (How did you go about this? Books? Journals? Databases etc.?) – Perhaps use a table here and show, which databases (Emerald/Sage etc.) you used and which journals come from where. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria of literature for the review (ensure the validity and reliability of the research studies you included in your review) 20 Findings of the literature review What does the literature tell you in relation to the three thematic approaches you need to develop? Did anything startling come out of the review that you were not expecting? 25 Conclusions and Implications Try to summarise your literature review and discuss your implications and recommendations. This section should not include any new material. 20 Presentation Cover Page, Table of Contents, Page numbering, Line spacing, Appendices (if it is necessary), Font consistency, Separation of paragraphs. 10 Harvard reference guide Citations and reference list according to the Harvard Referencing guide I can actually email you the instruction page as it’s too long for me to send here.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|